Damage propagation, Forest wind damage, Tree motion, Wind risk
Download the article:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByVlxqWw8eVkZmtFd1BNWUJnQWM/view?usp=sharing
Contributions :
1-Dupont, Brunet designed the research
2-Pivato
deeply modified the research, Dupont was against these changes
3-Pivato worked during more than 5 years including 18 months without funding
3-Pivato worked during more than 5 years including 18 months without funding
4-Pivato
carried out the first model simulations and data analysis
5-Pivato
wrote his PhD dissertation
6-Dupont,
Brunet contributed ideas to the dissertation
7-Pivato
defended his PhD and quit the INRA (May 2014)
8-Pivato
worked for the publication of the 3rd chapter of his dissertation
9-Dupont,
Brunet took Pivato apart from the publication of his work
10-Dupont improved the model simulations and data analysis
11-Brunet contributed ideas to the data analysis
12-Dupont, Brunet drafted the manuscript and of course Dupont made himself first author
10-Dupont improved the model simulations and data analysis
11-Brunet contributed ideas to the data analysis
12-Dupont, Brunet drafted the manuscript and of course Dupont made himself first author
13-Dupont,
Brunet submitted the manuscript to Nature (January 2015) without the agreement of Pivato
14-Nature
refused the manuscript without reviewing it
15-Dupont,
Brunet submitted the manuscript to Nature communication
16-Nature
communication refused the manuscript without reviewing it
17-Dupont,
Brunet submitted the manuscript to PNAS
18-PNAS
refused the manuscript without reviewing it
19-Dupont,
Brunet submitted the manuscript to AFM
20-The
manuscript was reviewed and sent back for revision
21-Pivato
dissented from the way the manuscript was drafted
22-Dupont,
Brunet called upon the INRA legal department to defend them because they were blindly
persuaded to be right. They lied by saying Pivato did not contribute to the writing of the manuscript.
23- The INRA legal department forced Dupont, Brunet to add the mention “Dupont, Pivato contributed equally to this work”
23- The INRA legal department forced Dupont, Brunet to add the mention “Dupont, Pivato contributed equally to this work”
24- The
manuscript was sent back to the AFM and accepted
The purpose
of this webpage is to warn people.
As I saw
pain and tears in the eyes of a good person who was despoiled by Yves Brunet.
As my work
was cowardly recovered and exploited by Sylvain Dupont and Yves Brunet.
Be careful
if you plan to work with these two usurpers.
